Connect with us

Business

Russian Tech Giant Reaches $5 Billion Deal to Quit Russia

Published

on

Russian Tech Giant Reaches $5 Billion Deal to Quit Russia

The parent firm of Russia’s most prominent technology company, Yandex, said it has agreed to sell all its assets in the country for about $5 billion, which would be one of the largest corporate exits from Russia since its invasion of Ukraine.

The invasion had roiled Yandex — often referred to as “Russia’s Google” — and turned its attempts to navigate between the Kremlin’s authoritarian policies and a Western blockade of the Russian economy into the most dramatic example of the war’s impact on the country’s once-vaunted tech sector.

The deal announced on Monday came after 18 months of negotiations. It is an attempt by some of the company’s executives to shield Yandex’s new generation of businesses from the war’s fallout and to obtain relief from European sanctions.

Under its terms, Yandex’s Dutch-registered parent company, known as YNV, would sell all its businesses based in Russia, which represented 95 percent of its revenues between January and September of last year, to a group of Yandex managers and Russia-connected investors. The businesses for sale account for most of the company’s assets and employ the bulk of its 26,000 employees.

The assets include a popular internet browser and Russia’s main food delivery and taxi-hailing apps. After the sale, YNV would keep control of four smaller subsidiaries focused on artificial intelligence, which are already operating outside Russia. The new entity would employ about 1,300 people, including about 1,000 technology specialists, most of them Russian.

YNV’s chairman said in a statement on Monday that the sale would enable the A.I. businesses — which develop technologies like self-driving cars, cloud computing and machine learning — to grow under new ownership unconnected to Russia.

The buyers would pay in shares and cash — in Chinese yuan transferred outside of Russia — in a deal worth about $5.2 billion in today’s prices. That value represents roughly half of Yandex’s current market capitalization, a reflection of steep discounts that the Kremlin has imposed to punish companies that have tried to leave the country and are based in countries that the Kremlin considers unfriendly.

Companies based in the West have faced extreme hurdles in their attempts to leave Russia in the past two years. Russian authorities must sign off on buyers, price and terms, often forcing the exiting companies to sell at fire-sale prices.

The deal is subject to government approvals in Russia and must be acceptable to European regulators. Yandex said it expected the first stage of the sale to take place by the middle of the year.

Aleksei L. Kudrin, Russia’s chief government auditor and a longtime confidant of President Vladimir V. Putin, became an official adviser to Yandex’s Russian businesses in December 2022, a step widely seen as an attempt to win government support for the restructuring plan.

“For us, it is important that the company continues to operate inside our country,” Dmitri S. Peskov, the Kremlin’s spokesman, told reporters on Monday, referring to Yandex. If the deal is approved, “the Russian management of the company would remain the largest owner — that’s also important,” he said, adding that he cannot comment on the details of corporate negotiations.

Various Western-based companies, including Danish brewer Carlsberg and German power company Uniper, had announced sales of their Russian assets to local buyers, only to have the deals scuppered by the Kremlin.

The buyers of Russia’s most recognizable tech company do not include any prominent members of the country’s business elite, a reflection of YNV’s difficult task of finding investors with large enough pockets but without direct connections to the Russian government or sanctioned officials and oligarchs.

The group of buyers is led by some of Yandex’s Russian management team, and includes tech entrepreneur Alexander Chachava and an investment fund owned by Russia’s largest private oil company, Lukoil. YNV said none of the buyers are under Western sanctions, and they are not allowed to sell or transfer their stakes for a year after completing the deal. These conditions are aimed at addressing Western concerns that the deal could ultimately benefit Kremlin insiders.

After the invasion of Ukraine, at least three senior Yandex executives publicly condemned the war, becoming some of the most prominent Russian businessmen to break with the government line. Thousands of the company’s employees have left the country following the invasion, often to continue working remotely.

The antiwar declarations, however, have not shielded the company from Western backlash. The European Union has sanctioned Yandex’s founder, Arkady Volosh, and its deputy chief executive at the time, Tigran Khudaverdyan, for enabling Russia’s war effort, forcing them to step down from the company to maintain its access to Western financial services.

The European Union said Yandex’s news aggregation service at the time had blocked antiwar content, in effect enabling Russia’s propaganda. The company said it had no choice but to comply with Russia’s strict censorship laws, and has since sold the news aggregation service.

Mr. Volozh has called the sanctions against him “misguided.”

“Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is barbaric, and I am categorically against it,” Mr. Volozh, who lives in Israel, said in a statement in August. “I have to take my share of responsibility for the country’s actions,” he said, without offering additional details.

After being sanctioned, Mr. Volosh cut formal ties to YNV, but still owns about 8 percent of the company’s shares.

The post Russian Tech Giant Reaches $5 Billion Deal to Quit Russia appeared first on New York Times.

The Business Diary magazine is a comprehensive publication that centers around business and economic development news. It covers a wide range of topics including finance, mining, technology, environment, climate finance, and agriculture. With its focus on providing valuable insights and updates, the magazine caters to readers who are interested in staying informed about the latest developments and trends in the business and economic landscape of Zimbabwe.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Business

Broadening the Base : Why Zimbabwe’s SME Strategy Could Define Fiscal Sustainability

Published

on

Broadening the Base : Why Zimbabwe’s SME Strategy Could Define Fiscal Sustainability

By Staff Reporter

For decades, tax authorities across Southern Africa have grappled with the same paradox: economies dominated by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that generate substantial economic value, yet contribute disproportionately little to national tax revenues.

In Zimbabwe, where informal and small-scale businesses now account for more than 60 percent of gross domestic product, that challenge has moved to the centre of fiscal policy — and with the 2026 National Budget, government is signalling a decisive shift in how it intends to close the gap.

At the heart of this strategy is a clear directive to the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA): make tax compliance simpler, fairer and more accessible for SMEs — not as a concession, but as a growth strategy.

Government has directed the ZIMRA to develop tailored, simplified strategies to bring small businesses and start-ups into the tax net in a bid to widen the tax base and meet ambitious revenue targets.

The policy push comes as Treasury sets its sights on US$7.57 billion in revenue for 2026, up from about US$6.2 billion previously, amid tightening fiscal conditions and rising demand for public services.

The medium-term revenue target stands at US$7.2 billion by end-2025, underscoring the urgency of broadening the tax base rather than increasing the burden on existing compliant taxpayers an uphill battle as a significant portion of economic activity remains outside the tax net.

Deputy Minister of Finance, Mr Kudakwashe Mnangagwa, framed SME compliance as both an economic and civic imperative and urged ZIMRA to widen the tax base and include the SME sector which accounts for more than 60% of Gross Domestic Product.

He said every tax payment is an act of patriotism, essential for national development in line with Vision 2030.

“ZIMRA must develop sector-specific strategies to bring start-ups, macro-operators, and small to medium enterprises into voluntary compliance and compliance must be fair, simple and enabling, never a barrier to innovation or enterprise,” Mr Mnangagwa said during the recent ZIMRA Taxpayer Appreciation Awards

“Taxes should create space for businesses to thrive, start-ups to grow and creativity to flourish.”

His remarks echo a growing regional consensus that coercive enforcement alone cannot sustainably integrate informal businesses into the tax system.

Zimbabwe’s SME sector has grown rapidly over the past decade, driven by de-industrialisation, demographic pressure and the expansion of informal trade.

According to the 2022 FinScope SME Survey, the sector contributes an estimated US$8.2 billion to National GDP, making it one of the most significant engines of economic activity.

Yet much of that value remains outside the formal tax net.

With more than 70 percent of the economy operating informally and largely cash-based, collecting value-added tax (VAT), corporate income tax and presumptive levies has proven increasingly difficult.

Weak record-keeping, limited digital access and mistrust of tax authorities have compounded the challenge.

Mr Mnangagwa condemned smuggling activities and tax evasion saying it undermined the country’s development.

Reports indicate that rampant tax evasion and widespread smuggling are crippling Zimbabwe’s revenue collection efforts, costing the nation millions of United States dollars annually and directly threatening the funding of critical public services, officials have warned.

According to official statistics, the government continues to lose vast sums to smuggling, tax fraud, under-invoicing and other illicit financial activities.

Some registered businesses fail to use or tamper with fiscalised electronic registers to underreport sales and avoid paying the correct amount of VAT.

Alongside reform, government has intensified its messaging on the costs of non-compliance. Smuggling, under-invoicing and tax fraud continue to drain public resources, costing the country millions of US dollars annually, according to official estimates.

Mnangagwa was blunt in his assessment, “Compliance is more than law, it is a moral commitment to our communities and future generations.”

“Every act of smuggling, evasion or corruption steals from our children, our communities and our future,” he said.

He linked revenue leakage directly to service delivery gaps, arguing that undeclared goods and falsified returns deprive hospitals of medicines, schools of textbooks and communities of infrastructure.

The challenge is not unique to Zimbabwe. The African Development Bank estimates that illicit financial flows cost the continent over US$80 billion annually, undermining development and investor confidence.

ZIMRA Chairperson, Mr Anthony Mandiwanza, said the authority is recalibrating its approach, balancing revenue mobilisation with practical support for taxpayers, making compliance simpler, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and start-ups.

Mr Mandiwanza said ZIMRA is pursuing a dual strategy anchored on aggressively expanding revenue collection while making compliance more accessible.

“In the spirit of leaving no one and no place behind, we are also taking services directly to citizens through mobile units, digital platforms, and kiosks at all regional offices,” he said.

“These initiatives are designed to address structural barriers faced by SMEs, including limited internet access, lack of digital literacy and high compliance costs relative to business size,” he said.

He said the push for “sector-specific strategies” and the expansion of mobile and digital tax services are designed to bring more players into the formal system voluntarily.

ZIMRA’s strategy aligns with international best practice. Across Africa, revenue authorities are increasingly adopting “facilitative compliance” models — simplifying registration, reducing filing frequency for small firms and offering education before penalties.

The Kenya Revenue Authority, for example, has rolled out mobile tax clinics and simplified turnover taxes for micro-enterprises, while South Africa’s SARS operates a graduated compliance framework for small businesses. Zimbabwe’s reforms suggest a similar trajectory.

Treasury’s revenue targets reflect growing confidence in macroeconomic stability, particularly following improved inflation control and currency management under the Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG) regime.

But analysts warn that targets of this scale cannot be met without tapping into the informal economy.

Economists note that Zimbabwe’s tax-to-GDP ratio, while improving, remains constrained by narrow compliance.

“Broadening the base is more sustainable than raising rates,” said one Harare-based fiscal analyst. “You cannot keep taxing the same formal firms harder while the majority of economic activity sits outside the system.”

Government’s SME support programmes strengthen this argument.

Treasury officials argue that formalisation and tax compliance should increasingly be tied to access to finance, markets and government support — a model used successfully in countries such as Rwanda and Mauritius.

In 2023, the government disbursed US$5,3 billion to support small and medium scale enterprises last year using the Small and Medium Enterprises Development Corporation, the Zimbabwe Women Microfinance Bank, the Zimbabwe Community Development Fund and the Women Development Fund.

Across Southern Africa, fiscal pressures are intensifying. Slower global growth, climate-related shocks and rising debt servicing costs have forced governments to seek more reliable domestic revenue streams.

Zimbabwe’s strategy reflects this regional reality. By focusing on SMEs — the most dynamic yet under-taxed segment of the economy — authorities are attempting to align revenue mobilisation with inclusive growth.

The 2026 Budget reinforces this logic by avoiding aggressive new taxes and instead focusing on compliance efficiency, digitalisation and behavioural change.

The push to ease SME compliance is not about lowering standards, but about widening opportunity. In an economy where small businesses are no longer peripheral but central, fiscal systems must adapt.

As the 2026 Budget takes effect, Zimbabwe’s revenue strategy sends a clear message: growth, compliance and development are not competing goals — they are mutually reinforcing.

The success of ZIMRA’s reforms will ultimately depend on execution. Simplification must be real, not rhetorical. Digital platforms must work reliably. Enforcement must remain firm but fair.

If successful, Zimbabwe could offer a regional case study in how to transition from a narrow, enforcement-heavy tax system to one built on participation and trust.

Continue Reading

Business

Meet World’s Richest Family Who live In $478m House, Own 700 Cars

Published

on

Meet World’s Richest Family Who live In $478m House, Own 700 Cars

According to The Jerusalem Post, the Nahyan royal family of the United Arab Emirates is a dominant corporate and political force in the Gulf area, as well as one of the world’s wealthiest families.

Their net worth is greater than the combined wealth of Microsoft founder Bill Gates and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the head of the Nahyan family, is the UAE’s President and the ruler of Abu Dhabi.

He has 18 brothers, 11 sisters, nine children, and eighteen grandchildren. All of the family members reside together in the “Qasr Al-Watan,” a massive edifice spanning 380,000 square meters and valued at $478 million.

The family’s real estate holdings comprises opulent houses and developments both in the UAE and abroad.

They own eight aircraft, including one Airbus A320-200 and three Boeing 787-9s. Sheikh Mohammed’s personal collection includes a $478 million Boeing 747 and a $176 million Boeing 787.

In addition, they have three of the world’s largest yachts.

Their car collection is nothing short of astounding. According to reports, their vehicles are split out over four museums in the UAE and Morocco. The family owns more than 700 cars, including Ferraris and Lamborghinis.

The family owns 81% of the City Football Group, which includes football clubs like Manchester City, Mumbai City, Melbourne City, and New York City.

Continue Reading

Business

Want to work at Meta? Average salary package in Mark Zuckerberg’s company is…

Published

on

Want to work at Meta. Average salary package in Mark Zuckerberg's company is

Big companies often get highlighted for the huge compensations that they offer and the perks one gets while working for them. Meta’s average package is a whopping $379,000, according to a recent SEC filing. The company, which employs around 67,000 people, said that its median employee made over $379,000 in the year 2023.

Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing at the US Capitol, in Washington, US. (Reuters)

The average pay for a tech position falls between $35,000 to $120,000 depending on the role, but Meta’s pay is significantly higher than that. However, giants like Google and Amazon offer packages that go well above $300,000 for similar positions.

Unlock exclusive access to the latest news on India’s general elections, only on the HT App. Download Now!

Also, higher-level software engineers and researchers in Meta make more in base pay than product designers and user experience professionals in the company.

What Mark Zuckerberg said on working at Meta?

CEO Mark Zuckerberg said earlier this year that working at Meta is not easy even if it offers such lucrative packages. He said that the year 2024 will be the “year of efficiency” in the company as he expects employees to maximize output and productivity.

How much does Mark Zuckerberg earn?

In the year 2023, Mark Zuckerberg noted a total compensation of $24.4 million in ‘other compensation,’ and a base salary of $1. According to Fortune, this covered his costs related to his private jet. His wealth has increased by over $47 billion this year alone, despite receiving a nominal salary of $1 since 2013.

As per reports, the company’s net profit in the January to March period rose to $12.4 billion with total revenue up by 27 percent, at $36.5 billion.

The company wrote in a filing, “We believe that Mr. Zuckerberg’s role puts him in a unique position: he is synonymous with Meta and, as a result, negative sentiment regarding our company is directly associated with, and often transferred to, Mr. Zuckerberg. Mr. Zuckerberg is one of the most-recognized executives in the world, in large part as a result of the size of our user base and our continued exposure to global media, legislative, and regulatory attention.”

Continue Reading

Trending