Connect with us

Business

People Think Coca-Cola Only Makes Money From Coca-Cola Beverages, but Half of Its Business Comes From Somewhere You Might Not Expect

Published

on

People Think Coca-Cola Only Makes Money From Coca-Cola Beverages, but Half of Its Business Comes From Somewhere You Might Not Expect

Coca-Cola (KO 0.20%) has some of the greatest brand prestige in the world. That’s one reason why Warren Buffett has said that he will never sell its stock, and it’s the reason the company can charge premium prices for drinks that are similar to those sold by its competitors.

But if you think Coca-Cola makes most of its business from selling Coke-branded beverages, you’d be mistaken.

Much more than Coke

Coca-Cola’s core brand is the Coca-Cola in the red-labeled bottles or cans that you’re certainly familiar with. It offers various takes on that trademark brand, such as Diet Coke and Cherry Coke, and it often comes up with new and limited-time flavors. These Coke products account for a large percentage of the company’s total volume — but not a majority.

People Think Coca-Cola Only Makes Money From Coca-Cola Beverages, but Half of Its Business Comes From Somewhere You Might Not Expect

People Think Coca-Cola Only Makes Money From Coca-Cola Beverages, but Half of Its Business Comes From Somewhere You Might Not Expect

So where does the majority of its business come from? Coca-Cola actually owns about 200 brands. It had owned about double that amount before the pandemic, but in recent years, it restructured and cut out a raft of underperforming brands that were eating up resources while accounting for low sales volumes.

Unlike rival PepsiCo, which has categories besides beverages, Coca-Cola deals strictly with drinks. However, Coca-Cola has several beverage categories: trademark Coca-Cola; other sparkling drinks; water, sports, coffee, and tea; and juice, value-added dairy, and plant-based drinks. It also has an “emerging beverages” category.

It would be easy for consumers to overlook that Coca-Cola owns so many of the brands that are going into their shopping carts. Among the other carbonated beverage brands in its portfolio are Fanta, Sprite, and Fresca. Vitamin Water and Powerade are some of its water and sports drink brands, and its juice and dairy names include Minute Maid and Fairlife. Among these brands, 26 are powerhouses in their own rights, each bringing in more than $1 billion in revenue annually.

A cola by any other name

The company doesn’t break down those categories’ sales by revenue, but by unit volume. Management explains in its filings that although total revenue isn’t directly based on unit volume, it’s an important indicator because it provides a clearer picture of consumer demand. In other words, total revenue is partially determined by pricing and partially by volume. The volume piece is the one that tells you what customers are buying.

In total, trademark Coca-Cola accounted for 46% of unit volume in 2022, and only 44% in the U.S.

Coca-Cola North American segment market share. View pictures in App save up to 80% data.
Image source: Coca-Cola.

Taken together, the other brands account for the majority of total unit volume. As strong as the Coke brand is, the company still relies on drinks like Fresca and Dasani to support its high sales volume and maintain its position as the top global beverage company.

But don’t underestimate the importance of pricing power. Coca-Cola reported an 8% year-over-year sales increase in 2023’s third quarter, but its unit case volume was only up 2%. Many companies reported similar revenue increases in the same period as they raised prices to compensate for rising costs.

Trademark Coca-Cola likely accounted for a high percentage of the revenue increase. Since the company can charge premium prices for this brand, it could still account for half or more of total revenue.

Why this is good for business

Coca-Cola puts a lot of effort into maintaining its trademark brand power, but it needs these other brands to keep its dominant position in the beverage market. In some regions, Coca-Cola enjoys extremely high brand recognition and accounts for more of the volume mix. In Latin America, for example, it’s 57%. However, it only accounts for 33% in the Asia Pacific region.

Some of its newer brands are generating its highest growth. For example, Fairlife volumes increased by double-digit percentages annually for the past eight years. Coca-Cola identifies acquisition targets that will diversify its portfolio of brands and allow it to reach more customers in regions where people are looking for different kinds of beverages. The company can usually absorb new brands with high efficiency by leveraging its vast, unmatched distribution network. That brings in more sales with strong margins.

It’s a robust business cycle. Sales of its core trademark Coca-Cola drinks bring in tons of reliable cash, and the company uses that cash to purchase higher-growth brands whose sales trickle down to strengthen the bottom line. It also uses a large portion of its cash to reward shareholders with its storied dividend, creating shareholder satisfaction and confidence. It’s no wonder Warren Buffett is such a huge fan.

The Business Diary magazine is a comprehensive publication that centers around business and economic development news. It covers a wide range of topics including finance, mining, technology, environment, climate finance, and agriculture. With its focus on providing valuable insights and updates, the magazine caters to readers who are interested in staying informed about the latest developments and trends in the business and economic landscape of Zimbabwe.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Business

Broadening the Base : Why Zimbabwe’s SME Strategy Could Define Fiscal Sustainability

Published

on

Broadening the Base : Why Zimbabwe’s SME Strategy Could Define Fiscal Sustainability

By Staff Reporter

For decades, tax authorities across Southern Africa have grappled with the same paradox: economies dominated by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that generate substantial economic value, yet contribute disproportionately little to national tax revenues.

In Zimbabwe, where informal and small-scale businesses now account for more than 60 percent of gross domestic product, that challenge has moved to the centre of fiscal policy — and with the 2026 National Budget, government is signalling a decisive shift in how it intends to close the gap.

At the heart of this strategy is a clear directive to the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA): make tax compliance simpler, fairer and more accessible for SMEs — not as a concession, but as a growth strategy.

Government has directed the ZIMRA to develop tailored, simplified strategies to bring small businesses and start-ups into the tax net in a bid to widen the tax base and meet ambitious revenue targets.

The policy push comes as Treasury sets its sights on US$7.57 billion in revenue for 2026, up from about US$6.2 billion previously, amid tightening fiscal conditions and rising demand for public services.

The medium-term revenue target stands at US$7.2 billion by end-2025, underscoring the urgency of broadening the tax base rather than increasing the burden on existing compliant taxpayers an uphill battle as a significant portion of economic activity remains outside the tax net.

Deputy Minister of Finance, Mr Kudakwashe Mnangagwa, framed SME compliance as both an economic and civic imperative and urged ZIMRA to widen the tax base and include the SME sector which accounts for more than 60% of Gross Domestic Product.

He said every tax payment is an act of patriotism, essential for national development in line with Vision 2030.

“ZIMRA must develop sector-specific strategies to bring start-ups, macro-operators, and small to medium enterprises into voluntary compliance and compliance must be fair, simple and enabling, never a barrier to innovation or enterprise,” Mr Mnangagwa said during the recent ZIMRA Taxpayer Appreciation Awards

“Taxes should create space for businesses to thrive, start-ups to grow and creativity to flourish.”

His remarks echo a growing regional consensus that coercive enforcement alone cannot sustainably integrate informal businesses into the tax system.

Zimbabwe’s SME sector has grown rapidly over the past decade, driven by de-industrialisation, demographic pressure and the expansion of informal trade.

According to the 2022 FinScope SME Survey, the sector contributes an estimated US$8.2 billion to National GDP, making it one of the most significant engines of economic activity.

Yet much of that value remains outside the formal tax net.

With more than 70 percent of the economy operating informally and largely cash-based, collecting value-added tax (VAT), corporate income tax and presumptive levies has proven increasingly difficult.

Weak record-keeping, limited digital access and mistrust of tax authorities have compounded the challenge.

Mr Mnangagwa condemned smuggling activities and tax evasion saying it undermined the country’s development.

Reports indicate that rampant tax evasion and widespread smuggling are crippling Zimbabwe’s revenue collection efforts, costing the nation millions of United States dollars annually and directly threatening the funding of critical public services, officials have warned.

According to official statistics, the government continues to lose vast sums to smuggling, tax fraud, under-invoicing and other illicit financial activities.

Some registered businesses fail to use or tamper with fiscalised electronic registers to underreport sales and avoid paying the correct amount of VAT.

Alongside reform, government has intensified its messaging on the costs of non-compliance. Smuggling, under-invoicing and tax fraud continue to drain public resources, costing the country millions of US dollars annually, according to official estimates.

Mnangagwa was blunt in his assessment, “Compliance is more than law, it is a moral commitment to our communities and future generations.”

“Every act of smuggling, evasion or corruption steals from our children, our communities and our future,” he said.

He linked revenue leakage directly to service delivery gaps, arguing that undeclared goods and falsified returns deprive hospitals of medicines, schools of textbooks and communities of infrastructure.

The challenge is not unique to Zimbabwe. The African Development Bank estimates that illicit financial flows cost the continent over US$80 billion annually, undermining development and investor confidence.

ZIMRA Chairperson, Mr Anthony Mandiwanza, said the authority is recalibrating its approach, balancing revenue mobilisation with practical support for taxpayers, making compliance simpler, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and start-ups.

Mr Mandiwanza said ZIMRA is pursuing a dual strategy anchored on aggressively expanding revenue collection while making compliance more accessible.

“In the spirit of leaving no one and no place behind, we are also taking services directly to citizens through mobile units, digital platforms, and kiosks at all regional offices,” he said.

“These initiatives are designed to address structural barriers faced by SMEs, including limited internet access, lack of digital literacy and high compliance costs relative to business size,” he said.

He said the push for “sector-specific strategies” and the expansion of mobile and digital tax services are designed to bring more players into the formal system voluntarily.

ZIMRA’s strategy aligns with international best practice. Across Africa, revenue authorities are increasingly adopting “facilitative compliance” models — simplifying registration, reducing filing frequency for small firms and offering education before penalties.

The Kenya Revenue Authority, for example, has rolled out mobile tax clinics and simplified turnover taxes for micro-enterprises, while South Africa’s SARS operates a graduated compliance framework for small businesses. Zimbabwe’s reforms suggest a similar trajectory.

Treasury’s revenue targets reflect growing confidence in macroeconomic stability, particularly following improved inflation control and currency management under the Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG) regime.

But analysts warn that targets of this scale cannot be met without tapping into the informal economy.

Economists note that Zimbabwe’s tax-to-GDP ratio, while improving, remains constrained by narrow compliance.

“Broadening the base is more sustainable than raising rates,” said one Harare-based fiscal analyst. “You cannot keep taxing the same formal firms harder while the majority of economic activity sits outside the system.”

Government’s SME support programmes strengthen this argument.

Treasury officials argue that formalisation and tax compliance should increasingly be tied to access to finance, markets and government support — a model used successfully in countries such as Rwanda and Mauritius.

In 2023, the government disbursed US$5,3 billion to support small and medium scale enterprises last year using the Small and Medium Enterprises Development Corporation, the Zimbabwe Women Microfinance Bank, the Zimbabwe Community Development Fund and the Women Development Fund.

Across Southern Africa, fiscal pressures are intensifying. Slower global growth, climate-related shocks and rising debt servicing costs have forced governments to seek more reliable domestic revenue streams.

Zimbabwe’s strategy reflects this regional reality. By focusing on SMEs — the most dynamic yet under-taxed segment of the economy — authorities are attempting to align revenue mobilisation with inclusive growth.

The 2026 Budget reinforces this logic by avoiding aggressive new taxes and instead focusing on compliance efficiency, digitalisation and behavioural change.

The push to ease SME compliance is not about lowering standards, but about widening opportunity. In an economy where small businesses are no longer peripheral but central, fiscal systems must adapt.

As the 2026 Budget takes effect, Zimbabwe’s revenue strategy sends a clear message: growth, compliance and development are not competing goals — they are mutually reinforcing.

The success of ZIMRA’s reforms will ultimately depend on execution. Simplification must be real, not rhetorical. Digital platforms must work reliably. Enforcement must remain firm but fair.

If successful, Zimbabwe could offer a regional case study in how to transition from a narrow, enforcement-heavy tax system to one built on participation and trust.

Continue Reading

Business

Meet World’s Richest Family Who live In $478m House, Own 700 Cars

Published

on

Meet World’s Richest Family Who live In $478m House, Own 700 Cars

According to The Jerusalem Post, the Nahyan royal family of the United Arab Emirates is a dominant corporate and political force in the Gulf area, as well as one of the world’s wealthiest families.

Their net worth is greater than the combined wealth of Microsoft founder Bill Gates and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the head of the Nahyan family, is the UAE’s President and the ruler of Abu Dhabi.

He has 18 brothers, 11 sisters, nine children, and eighteen grandchildren. All of the family members reside together in the “Qasr Al-Watan,” a massive edifice spanning 380,000 square meters and valued at $478 million.

The family’s real estate holdings comprises opulent houses and developments both in the UAE and abroad.

They own eight aircraft, including one Airbus A320-200 and three Boeing 787-9s. Sheikh Mohammed’s personal collection includes a $478 million Boeing 747 and a $176 million Boeing 787.

In addition, they have three of the world’s largest yachts.

Their car collection is nothing short of astounding. According to reports, their vehicles are split out over four museums in the UAE and Morocco. The family owns more than 700 cars, including Ferraris and Lamborghinis.

The family owns 81% of the City Football Group, which includes football clubs like Manchester City, Mumbai City, Melbourne City, and New York City.

Continue Reading

Business

Want to work at Meta? Average salary package in Mark Zuckerberg’s company is…

Published

on

Want to work at Meta. Average salary package in Mark Zuckerberg's company is

Big companies often get highlighted for the huge compensations that they offer and the perks one gets while working for them. Meta’s average package is a whopping $379,000, according to a recent SEC filing. The company, which employs around 67,000 people, said that its median employee made over $379,000 in the year 2023.

Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing at the US Capitol, in Washington, US. (Reuters)

The average pay for a tech position falls between $35,000 to $120,000 depending on the role, but Meta’s pay is significantly higher than that. However, giants like Google and Amazon offer packages that go well above $300,000 for similar positions.

Unlock exclusive access to the latest news on India’s general elections, only on the HT App. Download Now!

Also, higher-level software engineers and researchers in Meta make more in base pay than product designers and user experience professionals in the company.

What Mark Zuckerberg said on working at Meta?

CEO Mark Zuckerberg said earlier this year that working at Meta is not easy even if it offers such lucrative packages. He said that the year 2024 will be the “year of efficiency” in the company as he expects employees to maximize output and productivity.

How much does Mark Zuckerberg earn?

In the year 2023, Mark Zuckerberg noted a total compensation of $24.4 million in ‘other compensation,’ and a base salary of $1. According to Fortune, this covered his costs related to his private jet. His wealth has increased by over $47 billion this year alone, despite receiving a nominal salary of $1 since 2013.

As per reports, the company’s net profit in the January to March period rose to $12.4 billion with total revenue up by 27 percent, at $36.5 billion.

The company wrote in a filing, “We believe that Mr. Zuckerberg’s role puts him in a unique position: he is synonymous with Meta and, as a result, negative sentiment regarding our company is directly associated with, and often transferred to, Mr. Zuckerberg. Mr. Zuckerberg is one of the most-recognized executives in the world, in large part as a result of the size of our user base and our continued exposure to global media, legislative, and regulatory attention.”

Continue Reading

Trending