Finance
Zim Enjoys Currency Stability In Three Decades
Published
9 months agoon
For more than two decades, Zimbabwe has stood as a stark case study in monetary collapse, with hyperinflation, currency resets and eroded public trust defining its economic narrative.
Today, however, policymakers argue that the introduction of the Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG) currency marks a turning point not only for the country, but for resource-backed monetary reform in Southern Africa.
The country’s currency crisis has been a long-standing issue, dating back over two decades.
After years of hyperinflation, which peaked at 89.7 sextillion percent per month in November 2008, the Zimbabwean dollar (ZWL) was rendered practically worthless wiping out savings and collapsing economic activity.
By 2009, the country had no choice , abandoning the Zimbabwean dollar in 2009 in favor of a multi-currency regime, restoring price stability but surrendering monetary sovereignty to external currencies, primarily the United States dollar and South African Rand.
The launch of the ZiG by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe in April 2024 was meant to mark a new era of economic stability.
Zimbabwe’s sixth major currency adjustment since the 2000s was designed to restore monetary sovereignty — one of the key challenges of the multi-currency era that began in 2009.
Backed by gold reserves and other mineral assets, the currency was introduced at ZiG13.50 to the U.S. dollar.
As of late 2025, the exchange rate had remained relatively stable at around ZiG26.7 to the US dollar, significantly narrowing the gap between official and parallel market rates.
This was meant to revive faith in local money and bring inflation under control.
Zimbabwe has finally achieved what had eluded the country for decades – a stable local currency, Finance minister, Professor Mthuli Ncube, said.
Ncube attributes this stability to strict fiscal discipline, cash budgeting and the government’s refusal to finance deficits through central bank borrowing.
“This is the first time we have enjoyed domestic currency stability since 2003,” Professor Ncube told Parliament during the 2026 budget presentation, underscoring a deliberate shift toward consistency and discipline
“The Zimbabwe dollar was unstable; we abandoned it for the multi-currency system dominated by the US dollar, which we do not control,” adding that consistency in policy implementation has been key.
Inflation data supports the claim. According to ZimStat, month-on-month inflation turned negative in September and October 2025, while annual ZiG inflation declined to 32.7 percent, down from triple-digit levels recorded in recent years.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has since commended Zimbabwe for its impressive economic performance in 2025 citing improved macroeconomic stability.
Following its 2025 Article IV Consultation, IMF Resident Representative Dr. Daniel Gurara noted that inflation had eased and economic activity was picking up, driven largely by agriculture and mining.
“The stronger performance reflects a combination of favourable conditions in key sectors and ongoing efforts to strengthen macroeconomic stability through better policy coordination and tighter monetary management,” Dr. Gurara said.
“Inflation has eased, confidence is growing, and activity across sectors is picking up. Of course, risks remain from global uncertainty to climate shocks but the momentum is encouraging.”
The IMF noted that Zimbabwe’s economic growth for 2025 is now expected to exceed the earlier projection of six percent, driven by stronger-than-anticipated performance in agriculture and mining.
Dr. Gurara said the improved performance is also the result of sound macroeconomic management, including prudent fiscal policies, tighter monetary control, and enhanced revenue collection.
These measures have moderated inflation and helped rebuild business and consumer confidence.
“Going forward, maintaining fiscal discipline will be essential to consolidate recent gains, preserve stability, and create space for priority spending.
“Fiscal pressures, limited external financing, and climate vulnerabilities continue to pose challenges, but staying the course on reforms will ensure sustained and inclusive growth,” he emphasised.
Economist Dr. Zack Murerwa echoed the IMF’s positive outlook, describing the development as a reflection of the Second Republic’s steady reform trajectory and growing international credibility.
“This is a major vote of confidence in Zimbabwe’s economic direction. The key now is to sustain this momentum through continued engagement and re-engagement with global financiers and partners,” Dr. Murerwa said.
“The restored confidence in our economy must be preserved through consistency and policy discipline.”
The Article IV Mission involved extensive consultations with Professor Ncube, Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Governor Dr. John Mushayavanhu, and other senior government officials.
The IMF’s endorsement comes at a time Zimbabwe is intensifying its efforts to stabilise the currency, tame inflation, and attract new investment under the National Development Strategy 1 (NDS1), which lays the groundwork for achieving Vision 2030 and transforming the country into an upper middle-income economy.
A major milestone for Zimbabwe’s public accounts came with a revised GDP rebasing, which placed the economy at US$44.4 billion, making it the fifth-largest economy in the Southern African Development Community (SADC).
This update captures growth in previously unaccounted activity — particularly in manufacturing, informal trade and services — and highlights silent economic dynamism that official statistics had previously missed.
Official and independent projections indicate that growth could reach around 6.6 percent in 2025, driven by higher agricultural output, record gold prices, and recovery in services and manufacturing.
This trend contrasts favourably with regional pressures and aligns Zimbabwe with Africa’s broader mid-cycle recovery.
For the Southern African region, Zimbabwe’s experience offers a closely watched experiment in whether resource-backed currencies can restore monetary credibility in economies scarred by inflation.
You may like
Business
Zimbabwe’s Investment Agenda Enters a New Chapter as Tagwirei Takes Economic Development Portfolio
Published
11 hours agoon
October 12, 2026
The swearing-in of Kudakwashe Tagwirei as Minister of Economic Development and Investment Promotion places investment mobilisation, industrial expansion and the conversion of economic potential into tangible results at the centre of a newly defined government portfolio.
Zimbabwe’s economic development agenda entered a new phase on Monday, 12 October 2026, when President Emmerson Mnangagwa swore in Senator Dr Kudakwashe Regimond Tagwirei as Minister of Economic Development and Investment Promotion at State House in Harare. The ceremony followed the President’s appointment of Tagwirei to the portfolio on 9 October, alongside the reassignment of Professor Mthuli Ncube to the standalone Ministry of Finance.
The reorganisation separates economic development and investment promotion from the Finance Ministry, creating a distinct ministerial portfolio whose mandate places the attraction of capital, the advancement of economic activity and the implementation of national development priorities at the forefront.
For Zimbabwe, the significance of this change will ultimately depend on how effectively the new ministry translates national ambition into commercially viable projects, productive industries and improved economic opportunities for citizens.
From investment interest to investment delivery
Zimbabwe is not starting from a blank slate. The country has substantial mineral resources, agricultural potential, an established industrial base, a strategic position within Southern Africa and opportunities to expand regional trade.
The challenge has been to convert these advantages into a larger and more diversified productive economy.
According to figures reported by the Zimbabwe Investment and Development Agency (ZIDA), the country approved 378 investment licences valued at more than US$3 billion during the first half of 2026. Mining and manufacturing accounted for significant portions of the investment pipeline. These figures reflect approved investment proposals, however, and should not be confused with capital already deployed or projects fully operational.
This distinction is central to the new ministerial assignment.
An investment licence is an important first step, but its economic value becomes tangible when financing is secured, construction begins, equipment is installed, production starts and workers are employed.
The opportunity before Minister Tagwirei is to help strengthen the systems that move projects through these stages. Closer coordination between investment agencies, regulators, local authorities, financial institutions and infrastructure providers could help investors navigate approval processes, resolve implementation bottlenecks and bring viable projects to market more efficiently.
Such an approach would shift the national conversation from the value of investment announced to the value of investment realised.
A mandate aligned with Vision 2030
The appointment comes as Zimbabwe implements the National Development Strategy 2 (NDS 2), covering 2026–2030. The strategy seeks to accelerate progress towards the country’s ambition of becoming a prosperous and empowered upper-middle-income society by 2030. It emphasises economic transformation, infrastructure development, agricultural productivity, innovation, job creation and stronger international economic engagement.
This framework provides a clear context for the new ministry.
Economic development is not simply a matter of attracting more money into the country. It involves directing investment towards activities that expand productive capacity, strengthen domestic supply chains, increase exports and create sustainable employment.
For Minister Tagwirei, alignment between investment promotion and NDS 2 could provide an opportunity to connect national priorities with the commercial interests of domestic and international investors.
The most consequential investments will be those that create enduring economic value: factories that manufacture locally, mines that develop downstream processing capacity, agricultural enterprises that support agro-processing, and infrastructure projects that reduce the cost of doing business.
The task is to ensure that investment serves as a catalyst for broader economic transformation rather than remaining an isolated collection of individual projects.
Industrialisation: unlocking value beyond raw materials
Zimbabwe’s natural resource endowment presents an important opportunity for economic expansion, particularly when extraction is linked to domestic processing and manufacturing.
In mining, this means creating stronger connections between mineral production and downstream industries. In agriculture, it means moving further along the value chain, from primary production towards food processing, packaging, storage and export-ready products.
The potential benefits extend beyond the industries themselves. A growing manufacturing sector can create demand for transport, engineering, maintenance, packaging, financial services and professional expertise.
For smaller enterprises, stronger domestic value chains can create opportunities to supply larger businesses, participate in procurement programmes and expand into new markets.
The ministry can contribute by helping to coordinate investment opportunities across these interconnected sectors, identifying gaps in industrial capacity and supporting the development of projects with credible commercial prospects.
Energy reliability, transport infrastructure, access to finance and predictable regulation will remain critical to this process. Investment promotion is most effective when the environment in which investors operate supports production, competitiveness and long-term planning.
Building investor confidence
Investment decisions are influenced by more than the availability of natural resources or the size of a potential market. Investors also consider policy consistency, currency and financial risks, the predictability of regulations, the enforceability of contracts and the transparency of public institutions.
Zimbabwe’s ability to attract sustained investment will therefore depend on continued efforts to strengthen these fundamentals.
A credible investment-promotion programme must communicate opportunities clearly while providing investors with reliable information, consistent administrative processes and confidence that published rules will be applied fairly.
It must also demonstrate that investment opportunities are accessible to a broad range of legitimate participants, from major international institutions and regional investors to Zimbabwean entrepreneurs and smaller domestic businesses.
For the new minister, building confidence will require engagement across the investment community and close coordination with the institutions responsible for economic policy, regulation and implementation.
This is particularly important as Zimbabwe seeks to deepen regional trade, attract new productive capital and strengthen its position within African and global value chains.
The international investment community will judge progress not only by the announcements made by government, but also by the consistency of policy, the transparency of processes and the results delivered on the ground.
The significance of business leadership in public service
Tagwirei enters the portfolio with a background in business, including interests associated with Sakunda Holdings across sectors such as energy and agriculture. His experience in the commercial environment may offer familiarity with the practical considerations involved in operating businesses, mobilising resources and assessing investment opportunities.
That experience could be relevant to a portfolio concerned with the relationship between policy and enterprise. Understanding the challenges faced by investors can help inform discussions about project financing, infrastructure constraints, regulatory procedures and the conditions required for commercial activity to expand.
However, public office carries responsibilities that differ fundamentally from those of private enterprise. The ministerial role requires decisions to serve the national interest, with public confidence supported by accountability, transparent procedures and the consistent application of the law.
The opportunity is to apply commercial understanding within a framework of public service, ensuring that investment promotion is conducted in a manner that strengthens confidence in Zimbabwe’s institutions and supports fair economic participation.
For a country seeking to expand its investment base, the credibility of the process is as important as the opportunities being promoted.
What could this mean for Zimbabwean businesses?
A more effective investment-promotion framework could have benefits that extend well beyond large corporations.
For small and medium-sized enterprises, new industrial and infrastructure projects can create opportunities to supply goods and services, develop specialist capabilities and establish longer-term commercial relationships.
For farmers, investment in processing, storage, logistics and agricultural technology can help improve market access and reduce losses along the supply chain.
For young people entering the labour market, new productive enterprises can create demand for technical skills, professional services and entrepreneurship.
For established manufacturers, a more predictable business environment can support decisions to expand capacity, upgrade equipment and develop new products.
These outcomes are not automatic. They depend on the quality of investment, the strength of local supply chains, the availability of skills and the ability of businesses to compete. Nevertheless, they provide a practical way of assessing whether investment promotion is delivering benefits beyond headline figures.
The public interest lies in ensuring that economic growth generates opportunities across sectors, provinces and communities.
The priorities that will define the next chapter
As the ministry begins its work, several priorities are likely to be central to its contribution to the national development agenda.
First, converting approved investments into operating projects. Greater attention to implementation milestones, project financing and the removal of administrative bottlenecks could help narrow the gap between investment approvals and realised capital.
Second, strengthening coordination across government. Investors often require decisions and services from several institutions. Better coordination can help reduce uncertainty and improve the experience of doing business.
Third, prioritising productive and export-oriented investment. Projects that expand manufacturing, support mineral beneficiation, strengthen agro-processing and develop competitive services can contribute to diversification and foreign-exchange generation.
Fourth, broadening participation in economic growth. Local suppliers, small businesses, young entrepreneurs and skilled professionals should have opportunities to participate in the commercial activity generated by new investments.
Fifth, strengthening transparency and accountability. Clear investment criteria, predictable regulations and measurable performance indicators can help demonstrate that opportunities are being pursued in the national interest.
Together, these priorities offer a practical framework for translating the ambitions of NDS 2 into measurable economic outcomes.
Measuring success by results
Minister Tagwirei’s appointment creates an opportunity to sharpen the focus on investment delivery and economic development. The scale of that opportunity should not obscure the complexity of the task.
Zimbabwe’s economic prospects will be influenced by domestic policy choices, global market conditions, access to finance, infrastructure capacity and the competitiveness of local industries. No single ministry can resolve all these challenges independently.
The new portfolio can nevertheless play an important coordinating role by bringing investors, government institutions and productive sectors around a common set of national priorities.
Over time, progress should be assessed through evidence: the amount of investment actually deployed, projects completed, productive capacity added, exports generated, businesses supported and sustainable jobs created.
These are the indicators that connect economic policy to the lived experience of Zimbabweans.
A new chapter, with results to deliver
President Mnangagwa’s decision to establish a distinct economic development and investment promotion portfolio places renewed emphasis on the relationship between investment, production and national development.
For Tagwirei, the immediate task is to turn that mandate into a clear programme of action, working with government institutions and the private sector to improve the conditions for productive investment.
The opportunity is significant. Zimbabwe has resources to develop, agricultural potential to unlock, industries to expand and entrepreneurs capable of creating new enterprises. Converting these strengths into sustained prosperity will require sound policy, effective institutions, investor confidence and consistent implementation.
The measure of this new chapter will not be the appointment itself, but what follows: investments realised, industries strengthened, opportunities expanded and economic value created for the nation.
For Zimbabwe, that is the promise against which the work of the Ministry of Economic Development and Investment Promotion will be judged.
Editorial note: This article is based on publicly reported appointment and swearing-in details, published investment-approval figures and Zimbabwe’s NDS 2 development framework. Projections concerning the ministry’s potential impact are analysis, not claims that those outcomes have already been achieved.
The Business Diary – Telling Zimbabwe’s Business Story | “We Mean Business”
Finance
Beyond the Headlines: What Zimbabwe’s Entry into the BRICS Bank Really Means for Business
Published
3 months agoon
July 25, 2026Zimbabwe’s admission into the New Development Bank (NDB), the multilateral lender established by the BRICS nations, marks one of the country’s most significant international financial developments in years. While membership does not immediately unlock billions in funding, it expands Harare’s access to long-term development finance and signals growing international confidence in its economic re-engagement efforts. For businesses, investors and policymakers, the real question is not whether Zimbabwe has joined the BRICS Bank—but how effectively it can turn that membership into economic transformation.
A Seat at a Different Table
For more than two decades, Zimbabwe has struggled to access affordable long-term development finance.
International sanctions, sovereign debt arrears, limited access to traditional multilateral lenders and years of underinvestment have left the country with a substantial infrastructure deficit. Roads require rehabilitation, rail networks need modernisation, electricity generation must expand, and water systems demand significant investment to support both industry and urban growth.
Against that backdrop, Zimbabwe’s formal admission as a borrowing member of the New Development Bank (NDB)—widely known as the BRICS Bank—represents far more than another diplomatic milestone.
It introduces a new source of development finance at a time when the country’s infrastructure ambitions increasingly depend on patient, long-term capital rather than short-term borrowing.
The announcement by Finance, Economic Development and Investment Promotion Minister Professor Mthuli Ncube in July 2026 follows a three-year accession process that began with Zimbabwe’s formal application in 2023. The NDB Board of Governors approved Zimbabwe’s admission on 10 July 2026, making the country one of the bank’s newest borrowing members. Before financing can begin, Zimbabwe must ratify the membership agreement and subscribe to 630 shares valued at US$63 million, comprising US$12.6 million in paid-in capital and US$50.4 million in callable capital.
For Zimbabwe, membership is neither a bailout nor a guarantee of immediate investment. Rather, it is the opening of a financing channel that could reshape how major national infrastructure projects are funded over the coming decade.
That distinction matters.
Development banks do not simply lend money; they finance productive assets expected to generate long-term economic returns. Zimbabwe’s challenge now shifts from securing membership to identifying, preparing and executing projects capable of meeting the bank’s lending standards.
“Joining the New Development Bank is not the destination for Zimbabwe’s economic re-engagement—it is the beginning of a new test of the country’s ability to transform long-term finance into long-term prosperity.”
More Than Just Another Development Bank
Established in 2015 by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the New Development Bank was created to provide an alternative source of infrastructure and sustainable development financing for emerging economies.
Unlike institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, whose primary role is macroeconomic stabilisation, or the World Bank, which often combines lending with extensive policy programmes, the NDB focuses on financing infrastructure and development projects that promote long-term economic growth. Its founding mandate is to mobilise resources for transport, energy, water, climate resilience and industrial development across emerging markets.
The institution has authorised capital of US$100 billion and has steadily expanded beyond its original five founding members. Countries including Bangladesh, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Algeria, Colombia and Uzbekistan have also joined, reflecting the bank’s growing influence in development finance.
For Zimbabwe, the attraction lies not only in access to capital but also in diversification.
For decades, governments across Africa have relied heavily on financing from the World Bank, African Development Bank and bilateral lenders. Membership of the NDB broadens Zimbabwe’s financing options, reducing dependence on any single institution while creating opportunities to pursue projects aligned with its own development priorities.
Why This Matters for Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe’s economy has demonstrated resilience despite persistent structural challenges.
Research shows GDP growth reached 7.5% in 2025, driven largely by recoveries in agriculture and mining. Mining contributed 14.9% of economic output, manufacturing 14.6%, agriculture 12.2%, while wholesale and retail trade accounted for 11%. At the same time, public debt stood at approximately US$21.5 billion, including US$11.7 billion in external obligations and US$7.7 billion in arrears.
These figures illustrate a central contradiction within Zimbabwe’s economy.
The country possesses abundant mineral resources, productive agricultural land, a skilled workforce and strategic geographic positioning within Southern Africa. Yet many of the assets needed to unlock sustained economic growth—modern railways, reliable electricity, efficient border infrastructure, water systems and digital connectivity—require levels of investment that exceed the capacity of annual government budgets.
This is precisely where multilateral development finance becomes important.
Long-term infrastructure projects often require financing over decades rather than years. Commercial banks are generally reluctant to provide such funding because of the scale, duration and risk involved. Development banks exist to bridge that gap by financing projects capable of generating broad economic benefits beyond immediate financial returns.
For Zimbabwe, membership therefore expands the toolkit available to finance national development.
Beyond the Politics
Public discussion surrounding BRICS frequently focuses on geopolitics.
Questions about shifting global power, de-dollarisation and competition between Western economies and emerging markets often dominate headlines.
While these debates are important, Zimbabwe’s admission to the New Development Bank should first be understood through an economic lens rather than an ideological one.
Businesses are less concerned with geopolitical symbolism than with practical outcomes.
Can manufacturers reduce transport costs?
Will mining companies gain access to improved rail infrastructure?
Can exporters move goods more efficiently?
Will electricity become more reliable?
Can irrigation expand agricultural productivity?
Will cities secure financing for modern water systems?
These are the questions that determine whether development finance translates into economic growth.
Membership alone cannot answer them.
Successful implementation will depend on Zimbabwe’s ability to prepare technically sound, financially viable and environmentally sustainable projects capable of attracting NDB financing. The bank’s lending process requires rigorous project appraisal and does not provide automatic access to funding simply because a country has joined.
That reality tempers expectations while underscoring the importance of institutional capacity within government ministries, state-owned enterprises and implementing agencies.
The Business Diary Analysis
Zimbabwe has secured something more valuable than immediate funding—it has secured optionality.
In development finance, optionality matters.
Countries with multiple financing partners are generally better positioned to negotiate favourable terms, diversify project funding and reduce dependence on any single lender.
The significance of NDB membership therefore extends beyond the loans it may eventually provide.
It signals that Zimbabwe’s re-engagement strategy is opening new international relationships, even as efforts continue to resolve debt arrears with traditional multilateral institutions.
The next phase will determine whether this diplomatic achievement becomes an economic one.
Membership has opened the door.
Project execution will determine what lies beyond it.
Business
ZSE and NVCCZ Forge Strategic Partnership to Build Venture-Backed SME Pipeline for ZEEX
Published
4 months agoon
June 26, 2026
Harare, Zimbabwe – June 2026 – In a significant development for Zimbabwe’s entrepreneurial and capital markets ecosystem, the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange (ZSE) and the National Venture Capital Company of Zimbabwe (NVCCZ) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) aimed at creating a structured pathway for startups and small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) to access capital markets through the Zimbabwe Entrepreneurship Exchange (ZEEX).
The partnership marks a major step toward bridging the gap between venture capital financing and public market participation, providing entrepreneurs with a clear roadmap from startup funding to long-term growth and investment opportunities.
Creating a Growth Journey for Zimbabwean Enterprises
Historically, venture capital funding and capital markets have operated independently, leaving many promising businesses without a clear route to scale beyond their initial funding stages. Through this partnership, ZSE and NVCCZ seek to change that by establishing a continuum of support that combines financing, governance, compliance readiness, and market access.
The collaboration will focus on identifying high-potential startups and SMEs already supported by NVCCZ and preparing them for eventual participation on ZEEX, Zimbabwe’s newly approved digital capital market platform.
Key Areas of Collaboration
1. Pipeline Development
The two institutions will jointly identify venture-backed businesses with strong growth potential and develop structured graduation pathways that guide them from early-stage financing to public capital market participation. Clear eligibility standards and quality benchmarks will be established to support this transition.
2. Co-Financing and Blended Finance
The partnership will explore innovative financing models that combine venture capital and public market funding. This includes co-investment opportunities and blended finance mechanisms that leverage both public and private sector capital to accelerate business growth.
3. Capacity Building
Recognising that access to capital alone is not enough, the partners will offer training programmes focusing on corporate governance, financial reporting, investor readiness, and compliance with ZEEX listing requirements. Selected enterprises will also receive advisory support to strengthen their readiness for market participation.
4. Market Development
Joint awareness campaigns, investor roadshows, SME financing conferences, and sector-specific financing platforms will be developed to deepen understanding of capital market opportunities among entrepreneurs and investors alike.
5. Product Innovation
The agreement also opens the door for the development of innovative financial products tailored to growth-stage businesses, including SME bond programmes, sustainability-linked instruments, structured SME funds, and alternative digital listing platforms.
Strengthening Zimbabwe’s Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
Speaking on the partnership, ZSE Holdings Group CEO Justin Bgoni highlighted the importance of creating a structured connection between venture capital and public markets.
He noted that entrepreneurs receiving venture capital support can now see a credible pathway toward public market participation from the outset, providing greater certainty and long-term planning opportunities.
NVCCZ Chief Executive Officer Tinotenda Kambasha described the partnership as a milestone for Zimbabwe’s innovation ecosystem, emphasizing that successful venture investing requires support throughout the entire growth journey of a business.
According to Kambasha, the collaboration will provide venture-backed enterprises with strategic exit opportunities while promoting investor participation, improving liquidity, and enabling the recycling of capital into future generations of innovative Zimbabwean businesses.
What This Means for Zimbabwe
The partnership arrives at a critical time when Zimbabwe is seeking new ways to stimulate entrepreneurship, attract investment, create employment, and accelerate economic growth.
By connecting startups, SMEs, investors, venture capital providers, and the capital markets through ZEEX, the initiative is expected to strengthen financial inclusion, support business formalisation, and create sustainable pathways for enterprise growth.
As ZEEX moves closer to full operationalisation, the growing number of institutional partnerships being secured by ZSE demonstrates increasing confidence in the platform’s potential to transform how Zimbabwean businesses raise capital and how investors participate in the country’s economic development.
For entrepreneurs and investors alike, the ZSE-NVCCZ partnership represents an important step toward building a more vibrant, innovative, and investment-ready Zimbabwean economy.
Zimbabwe’s Investment Agenda Enters a New Chapter as Tagwirei Takes Economic Development Portfolio
Beyond the Headlines: What Zimbabwe’s Entry into the BRICS Bank Really Means for Business
ZSE and NVCCZ Forge Strategic Partnership to Build Venture-Backed SME Pipeline for ZEEX
What is Robert Kiyosaki’s net worth after his latest book flop?
Egypt’s Richest Man, Nassef Sawiris’ Wealth Surges by $410M in Just over a Week.
Billionaires Who Didn’t Go to College
Trending
-
Business2 years agoWhat is Robert Kiyosaki’s net worth after his latest book flop?
-
Business2 years agoEgypt’s Richest Man, Nassef Sawiris’ Wealth Surges by $410M in Just over a Week.
-
Business2 years agoBillionaires Who Didn’t Go to College
-
Business3 years agoAfrica’s youngest billionaire: Mo Dewji’s impactful empire extends beyond wealth
-
Business2 years agoMeet World’s Richest Family Who live In $478m House, Own 700 Cars
-
Technology3 years agoLiquid C2 partners with Google Cloud and Anthropic to bring advanced cloud, cyber security and generative AI capabilities to Africa
-
Business3 years agoZimbabwe’s Beverage Industry: A Digital Marketing Analysis of Delta Beverages and Varun Beverages Zimbabwe
-
Business3 years agoMalawian Billionaire Thom Mpinganjira’s Fortune Drops by $8 Million in a Month
